Mark Lawrence
- Home
- Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence
About the Author
Books
Prinz der Dunkelheit: Roman
Sag uns kurz, wie du heißt.
Jorg. Eigentlich Kronprinz Jorg von Ankrath, aber das war einmal.
Du siehst jung aus. Wie alt bist du, fünfzehn?
Knapp daneben. Mit fünfzehn werde ich König sein!
Du bist die meistgehasste Person im ganzen Land. Warum?
Nun ja, wenn man mit einer Horde Gesetzloser ganze Dörfer niederbrennt, löst das Unmut aus. Aber was würdest du tun, wenn die Königin, also deine Mutter, und dein Bruder vor deinen Augen getötet werden? Dieser Hass ist erst der Vorgeschmack auf meine Rache – denn die wird tödlich sein!
The Book That Wouldn't Burn (The Library Trilogy 1)
Two strangers find themselves connected by a vast and mysterious library containing many wonders and still more secrets, in this powerfully moving first book in a new series from the international bestselling author of Red Sister and Prince of Thorns.
The boy has lived his whole life trapped within a book-choked chamber older than empires and larger than cities.
The girl has been plucked from the outskirts of civilization to be trained as a librarian, studying the mysteries of the great library at the heart of her kingdom.
They were never supposed to meet. But in the library, they did.
Their stories spiral around each other, across worlds and time. This is a tale of truth and lies and hearts, and the blurring of one into another. A journey on which knowledge erodes certainty and on which, though the pen may be mightier than the sword, blood will be spilled and cities burned.
Articles
Overcoming My Fear of Rejection
Overcoming my Fear of Rejection
Rejection is never easy. Whether it’s a form rejection, or a sincere message from the editor saying they enjoyed your work, but it narrowly missed out, it doesn’t make it any easier. Here’s how I overcame my fear of rejection, and it might help you change the way you think about it too.
I Accepted it Will Happen
It’s difficult to think the piece of writing you’re so proud of can be rejected by someone who “doesn’t get it.” It’s important not to get defensive about it. These are the people who decide which work gets published, so their opinion counts for anyone who wants their work accepted. They are people too, and may have missed your point, but it’s also possible that whatever you were trying to get across wasn’t as clear as you thought. Either way, arguing with them will only result in losing the opportunity to send more work for their consideration.
I’ve learned to accept not everyone will like my stuff, and although I’ve never argued with an editor who has rejected my work, I have privately disagreed with their decision. Now I know some people will like my work and others won’t, I can only aim to send my best writing, then wait to see which camp the editor and submission readers fall into.
Proof Publishers’ Tastes Vary From Each Other
I recently had a piece of flash fiction that I sent in response to two different submission calls. One was a website I had submitted several pieces to before, all of which were rejected. I tried again, because I thought this was my strongest flash fiction story so far. It was accepted, and in the feedback from the submission reader, he said he liked the second person narrator and the twist in the story.
I forgot about the second publisher I sent it to until they rejected it, saying the second person narration prevented them from getting inside the victim’s head and the twist didn’t work. This is the perfect example of how tastes vary and not everyone likes the same thing, even editors and publishers.
By understanding this, it makes rejection easier. I’m not being rejected, just my writing, and only because it doesn’t work for them. It can still work for someone else. How do you tell the difference between your piece not being a fit for one or two publications, and not being a good fit anywhere? One way to tell is if everyone says the same thing. Then it probably needs changing.
I Expected Rejection to Happen
I don’t mean this in a pessimistic way, but realistically, such as thinking of each rejection as being one step closer to acceptance. Resolved that my work would receive more rejections than acceptances, it was easier to send it out into the world. I set myself a challenge to get an average of one rejection a day – or a total of 365 in a year. Some days, I had several. I think my record was 8 in a day, and I made a big celebration of it on social media. I think it helped other writer friends to see this, because lots of people only share their successes. If nothing else, it decreased the disappointment of rejection, because it became the norm, but the rarer acceptances were more of an occasion to feel proud of my work.
I Stopped Listening to Friends
This is no offence to any friends who have ever complimented my writing. However, unless your friends are prepared to be constructive, accepting their biased praise is nice to hear, but not helpful in finding out where you need to improve. Also, they are not the ones who have a say in you getting published. So, I always thank them, but (politely) ignore any comments from friends and acquaintances, unless I feel like they are well balanced – not just complimentary.
An Example of How Listening to Friends Doesn’t Help
I have been on the other side of the fence with submissions and had to reject a poem that I didn’t think was good enough. I was polite about it, but skated around the fact that her work needed to reach the point sooner, by saying it was too long. The writer went on social media, posted the rejection and poem, then all her friends praised her writing. I’m sure that was nice for her to hear, but not particularly useful for helping her make changes and increase her chances of getting it accepted somewhere else.
I Tried to Learn from Rejection
On the rare occasions I get feedback with a rejection, I treat it like gold dust. I’ve made changes based on feedback, and had work accepted either by the same publisher or elsewhere. Ignoring the natural reaction to defend my written words helps me accept feedback and make improvements. Don’t let ego stand in the way.
It wasn’t an easy achievement. The first Creative Writing module I studied as part of my degree, came with a lot of feedback from the tutor. I took it personally and thought he didn’t like me. It was only on the second module, when I took the feedback on board. As I sent out more submissions, I realized how rare and valuable feedback is. I used some of it to change and improve my work. I went on to do a Creative Writing MA, and the constrictive criticism from this helped me reason with myself why I had made certain decisions in my writing. I took the feedback from rejections and used this to either change my work, or make other parts clearer if I thought they had missed the point. The important thing was, I explicitly chose what to keep or change, and I knew why. I wasn’t blindly clinging to something I was told to change.
As writers, we all experience our writing being rejected, but getting your work out there means giving it a chance to be accepted. It’s scary, but it will be worth it in the end.
Amanda Nicholson is an author, poet, podcast co-host and copywriter. She co-hosts the book review podcast Reading in Bed. She has written several books under the name Amanda Steel, including Ghost of Me, which was a finalist in the Author Elite Awards 2020.
Amanda’s poetry has been broadcast on BBC Radio Manchester, and her story Clown Control was featured on The NoSleep Podcast. She has a Creative Writing MA, and has had articles published by Writers Weekly, Jericho Writers and The Market List.